首页> 外文OA文献 >Bank Lending Policy, Credit Scoring, and the Survival of Loans
【2h】

Bank Lending Policy, Credit Scoring, and the Survival of Loans

机译:银行贷款政策,信用评分和贷款存续

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To evaluate loan applicants, banks increasingly use credit scoring models. The objective of such models typically is to minimize default rates or the number of incorrectly classified loans. Thereby they fail to take into account that loans are multiperiod contracts, for which reason it is important for banks not only to know if but also when a loan will default. In this paper a bivariate tobit model with a variable censoring threshold and sample selection effects is estimated for (1) the decision to provide a loan or not and (2) the survival time of granted loans. The model proves to be an effective tool to separate applicants with short and with long survival times. The bank's loan provision process is shown to be inefficient: loans are granted in a way that conflicts with both default risk minimization and survival time maximization. There is thus no trade-off between higher default risk and higher return in the lending policy. © 2004 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
机译:为了评估贷款申请人,银行越来越多地使用信用评分模型。这种模型的目标通常是最小化违约率或分类错误的贷款数量。因此,他们没有考虑到贷款是多期合同,因此,重要的是,银行不仅要知道贷款是否到期,而且还要知道贷款何时会违约。本文针对(1)是否提供贷款的决定和(2)授予贷款的生存时间,估计了具有可变审查阈值和样本选择效应的双变量轨道模型。该模型证明是有效的工具,可以将生存期短和长的申请人分开。事实证明,银行的贷款准备流程效率低下:发放贷款的方式既与违约风险最小化又与生存时间最大化相冲突。因此,在贷款政策中,较高的违约风险和较高的回报之间没有权衡取舍。 ©2004哈佛学院和麻省理工学院的院长。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kasper Roszbach;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号